A reply to critics

Authors

  • Dmitry B. Volkov The Moscow Center for Consciousness Studies (Russia)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2018-11-3-188-190

Keywords:

personal identity, reduplication, narrative approach

Abstract

In this essay, I reply to the main objections from Maria Sekatskaya, Igor Gasparov and Sergei Levin to my previous paper, Benefits of a narrative approach to personal identity. In my reply to Sekatskaya, I accept that the narrative approach does not always provide means for reidentification in the duplication scenario, but I argue that reidentification is not necessary for the theory of personal identity. In my reply to Gasparov, I argue that character and personhood can be secondary in relation to the narrative; I also provide details for the criteria of narrative presentation. In my reply to Levin, I agree that the narrative approach is an anti-realist approach to personal identity, but I suggest that this is consistent with the four-dimensional concept of person.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-09

Issue

Section

ACADEMIC DISCUSSIONS

How to Cite

[1]
2018. A reply to critics. Filosofskii zhurnal | Philosophy Journal. 11, 3 (Aug. 2018), 188–190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2018-11-3-188-190.