Nikolay Danilevsky: between Slavophilism and Pan-Slavism

Authors

  • Mikhail A. Maslin Lomonosov Moscow State University (Russia)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-4-5-18

Keywords:

Slavophilism, Pan-Slavism, Austroslavism, cultural-historical types, Russia and Europe, Slavic cultural-historical type

Abstract

Nikolay Danilevsky’s book “Russia and Europe” was written in hot pursuit of the Crimean War (1853–1856), when the powers of Holy Union broke political equilibrium after the victory of the Russian army over Napoleon and started a new aggressive war against Russia, the only sovereign Slavic state in Europe. The book could be evaluated as an in­tellectual epilogue of the Crimean War in which there were pointed out two central prob­lems: firstly, to show the sovereignty and future perspectives of Slavic civilization, which has occupied it’s own legitimate historic place in Europe as an independent cultural-his­toric type; secondly, to construct the project of the All-Slavic Union as a protective bar­rier against European invasion. The solution of the first problem was based on the tradi­tions of Russian thought, especially on Slavophilism. So that demonstrated it’s culmina­tion and specific Russian contribution to the world civilizational theory. The solution of the second problem was based on the “circle of conservative utopia” (A. Walicki) de­rived from the European Pan-Slavism (Austroslavism), founded on the territory of Aus­tro-Hungarian Empire as early as at the beginning of the nineteenth century. The contra­dictory combination of Slavophilism and Pan-Slavism is the subject of the historiosophi­cal study in the current article.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-10

Issue

Section

HISTORY AND THEORY OF CULTURE

How to Cite

[1]
2023. Nikolay Danilevsky: between Slavophilism and Pan-Slavism. Filosofskii zhurnal | Philosophy Journal. 16, 4 (Nov. 2023), 5–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-4-5-18.