Two faces of the philosophy of history

Authors

  • Vladimir N. Porus National Research University "Higher School of Economics" (Russia)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-1-104-116

Keywords:

history, historiosophy, philosophy of history, methodology of historical science, historical narrative

Abstract

The main focus of the article is the double-meaning of the term “philosophy of history”. In the first sense it is understood as formation of historiosophical explanatory schemes of historical processes, in the second one as philosophical and methodological analysis of historical knowledge and research processes of historical science. Confusion of the two meanings leads to misunderstanding and strained relationship between historical studies and philosophy of history. However, their sharp opposition does not result in any positive outcomes. Historiosophy and analysis of historical knowledge serve as platforms for mutual criticism. This criticism is aimed at defining the potential to which philosophy of history could shape historical consciousness of contemporary culture.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-26

Issue

Section

ACADEMIC DISCUSSIONS

How to Cite

[1]
2019. Two faces of the philosophy of history. Filosofskii zhurnal | Philosophy Journal. 12, 1 (Feb. 2019), 104–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-1-104-116.