“Language barrier” in theories of mind and limitations of the computational approach

Authors

  • Pavel N. Baryshnikov Pyatigorsk State University (Russia)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2024-17-2-122-136

Keywords:

computational approach, philosophy of mind, philosophy of consciousness, scientific metaphor, “explanatory gap”, empirical theories of consciousness, methodological limitations

Abstract

This paper examines from a special perspective the problem of methodological limita­tions of the computational approach in the philosophy of mind and empirical sciences. The main goal is to consistently substantiate the dependence of philosophical “metaphori­cal dictionaries” on advances in the field of computer science, historical contexts of epis­temology, formal and methodological limitations of algorithmic and computational proce­dures. The key idea is that despite the success of computational models in empirical re­search, their conceptual level does not allow us to correctly formulate the question of the ontology of consciousness. Computationalism in philosophical theories of con­sciousness is presented as a practice of word usage, which posits systems of consistent descriptions of the information properties of consciousness and cognitive processes within the framework of certain methodological rules. The limitations of the computa­tional approach are associated with the lack of a scientific theory of subjectivity, the fun­damental irreducibility of external properties of consciousness to internal states, and fun­damental restrictions on the completeness and consistency of computer mathematics. A classification of several anti-computational programs has been carried out. The article discusses various limitations of computational approaches, such as: the complexity of for­malizing nonlinear and hidden processes, the dependence of emotions and intuition on the situational context and individual differences, the difficulty of predicting the emerg­ing properties of autonomous and autopoietic systems, and the limitations associated with non-standard computational processes of quantum and dynamic phenomena. A special role is given to the problem of set-theoretic reductive realism within the framework of mathe­matical structuralism and some aspects of p-adic number systems as a possible alternative to a “universal language” for the computational philosophy of consciousness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-09

Issue

Section

ACADEMIC DISCUSSIONS

How to Cite

[1]
2024. “Language barrier” in theories of mind and limitations of the computational approach. Filosofskii zhurnal | Philosophy Journal. 17, 2 (Jul. 2024), 122–136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2024-17-2-122-136.